Audi TT 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda MX-5 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 - 360 HP | 126 - 160 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 465 NM | 167 - 188 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 7.7 seconds | 7.9 - 9.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.5 | 7.1 - 8.0 | |
On average, the Audi TT petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda MX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.26 m | |
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 17 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 150 litres | |
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Audi TT has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`712 | ~ 1`375 | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda MX-5 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |