Audi TT 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
Mazda MX-5
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda MX-5 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)1.8 - 2.0 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 160 - 360 HP126 - 160 HP
Torque: 250 - 465 NM167 - 188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 - 7.7 seconds7.9 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 9.57.1 - 8.0
On average, the Audi TT petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda MX-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.02 m
Width: 1.84 m1.72 m
Height: 1.36 m1.26 m
Audi TT is larger.
Audi TT is 17 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres150 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Audi TT has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`712~ 1`375
Safety:
Mazda MX-5 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Mazda MX-5 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv