Audi TT 2010 vs Audi TT 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 - 340 HP | 160 - 340 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 450 NM | 250 - 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.3 - 7.5 seconds | 4.6 - 7.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.2 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
Audi TT 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT 2006. On average, Audi TT 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.35 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi TT 2010 and Audi TT 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 290 litres | |
Audi TT 2010 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT 2006. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT 2010 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi TT 2006. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`755 | ~ 1`763 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi TT has
| |