Audi S3 2013 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Audi S3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi S3 engine produces 137 HP more power than Volvo S60, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Audi S3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 4.8 | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi S3 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S3 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Audi S3 is smaller. Audi S3 is 16 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi S3 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Audi S3 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |