Audi S3 2016 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi S3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi S3 engine produces 194 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Audi S3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.1 | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi S3 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi S3 could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi S3 is larger, but lower. Audi S3 is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 415 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi S3 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Audi S3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |