Audi S3 2016 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi S3 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Rapid can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 160 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.3 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.0 | 4.0 - 4.8 | |
|
Audi S3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi S3 is larger, but lower. Audi S3 is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi S3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 415 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi S3 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Audi S3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`008 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi S3 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |