Audi Q7 2006 vs Mazda CX-9 2007

 
Audi Q7
2006 - 2009
Mazda CX-9
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 233 HP263 HP
Torque: 500 NM339 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 secondsn/a seconds
Audi Q7 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 161 NM more than Mazda CX-9.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.512.7
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi Q7 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Audi Q7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres76 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway710 km on highway
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 500'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 2 years1 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi Q7 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 5.09 m5.07 m
Width: 1.98 m1.94 m
Height: 1.74 m1.73 m
Audi Q7 is larger.
Audi Q7 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q7 is 1 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 775 litres487 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 775 litres487 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2035 litres2852 litres
In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 288 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 817 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`9902`735
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 78006800
Pros and Cons: Audi Q7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mazda CX-9 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv