Audi Q3 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, but torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q3 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Audi Q3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |