Audi Q3 2014 vs Toyota C-HR 2016

 
Audi Q3
2014 - 2018
Toyota C-HR
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 184 HP122 HP
Torque: 380 NM142 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds11 seconds
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi Q3 engine produces 62 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 238 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.13.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1250 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1220 km on highway
880 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.36 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.61 m1.56 m
Audi Q3 is larger.
Audi Q3 is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres377 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1365 litresno data
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi Q3 has 83 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2251`860
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 17 80019 000
Pros and Cons: Audi Q3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Toyota C-HR has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv