Audi Q3 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi Q3
2011 - 2014
Volvo XC60
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.02.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 140 - 211 HP163 - 285 HP
Torque: 250 - 380 NM300 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 9.9 seconds7.5 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 7.76.0 - 11.9
Audi Q3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Audi Q3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 184 mm (7.2 inches)230 mm (9.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.89 m
Height: 1.61 m1.71 m
Audi Q3 is smaller.
Audi Q3 is 25 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q3 is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1455 litres
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space.
Audi Q3 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`105~ 2`499
Safety:
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 13 6009400
Pros and Cons: Audi Q3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Volvo XC60 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv