Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Stelvio engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Stelvio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.8 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo Stelvio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Stelvio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is larger. Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 14 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio has 19 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Alfa Romeo Stelvio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 800 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |