Alfa Romeo Spider 1995 vs BMW Z3 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Spider engine produces 10 HP more power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 6 NM more than BMW Z3. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Spider reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo Spider consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo Spider could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo Spider consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Alfa Romeo Spider gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Spider) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is larger. Alfa Romeo Spider is 26 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 9 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Spider is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 110 litres | 165 litres | |
|
BMW Z3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo Spider has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z3. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo Spider uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Spider is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Alfa Romeo Spider can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Spider has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |