Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013 vs Hyundai i20 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i20 is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo MiTo engine produces 15 HP less power than Hyundai i20, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Hyundai i20. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo MiTo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo MiTo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo MiTo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i20 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat 500 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai Kona | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai i20, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1042 litres | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo MiTo has 56 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i20. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo MiTo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 1.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |