Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008 vs Mini Cooper 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo MiTo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mini Cooper has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 - 170 HP | 112 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 320 NM | 160 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 12 seconds | 9.1 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.5 | 3.8 - 6.4 | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mini Cooper. On average, Alfa Romeo MiTo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is larger. Alfa Romeo MiTo is 34 cm longer than the Mini Cooper, 4 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo MiTo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 160 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 680 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 110 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Alfa Romeo MiTo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`629 | ~ 1`554 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |