Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs BMW 3 series 2018

 
Alfa Romeo Giulia
2016 -
BMW 3 series
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.1 Diesel3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP382 HP
Torque: 450 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.1 secondsn/a seconds
Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 202 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 50 NM less than BMW 3 series.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.29.4
The Alfa Romeo Giulia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo Giulia consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Giulia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1380 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
1650 km on highway750 km on highway
Alfa Romeo Giulia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

BMW 3 sērija 2018: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.71 m
Width: 1.87 m1.83 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Alfa Romeo Giulia is 7 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 5 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): 1`445no data
Safety:
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 29 80036 400
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo Giulia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv