Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs BMW 2 series 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 2 series, but torque is 50 NM more than BMW 2 series. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Giulia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo Giulia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo Giulia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo Giulia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1650 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Alfa Romeo Giulia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Giulia) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia is larger. Alfa Romeo Giulia is 11 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 2 series is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 30 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |