Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Alfa Romeo Giulia
2016 -
Volvo V40
2016 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Alfa Romeo Giulia is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.1 - 2.91.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 510 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 380 - 600 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 3.9 - 8.4 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 8.53.4 - 5.9
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.37 m
Width: 1.87 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Alfa Romeo Giulia is larger, but slightly lower.
Alfa Romeo Giulia is 27 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 7 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`444~ 1`978
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 29 80013 200
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo V40 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv