Alfa Romeo GTV 1998 vs Ford Puma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 271 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo GTV engine produces 75 HP more power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 114 NM more than Ford Puma. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo GTV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 7.4 | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo GTV could require 510 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo GTV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo GTV is 30 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 11 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo GTV is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 110 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GTV is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Alfa Romeo GTV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo GTV has
|
Ford Puma has
| |