Alfa Romeo GTV 1998 vs Nissan 200 SX 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo GTV engine produces 45 HP less power than Nissan 200 SX, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Nissan 200 SX. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo GTV reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo GTV is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo GTV could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GTV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Alfa Romeo GTV is 24 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo GTV is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 110 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Nissan 200 SX has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo GTV has 197 litres less trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GTV is 1.6 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Alfa Romeo GTV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |