Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Mazda 626 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 226 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 111 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 7.9 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 765 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 166 is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 11 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 502 litres | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |