Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 161 HP | |
Torque: | 304 NM | 218 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 25 HP less power than Chrysler Stratus, but torque is 86 NM more than Chrysler Stratus. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 10.7 | |
The Alfa Romeo 166 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 166 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
1260 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
Alfa Romeo 166 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is 3 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |