Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Honda Saber 1998

 
Alfa Romeo 166
1998 - 2002
Honda Saber
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 155 HP200 HP
Torque: 187 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 secondsn/a seconds
Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 45 HP less power than Honda Saber, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Honda Saber.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.7no data
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres65 litres

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 290'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Saber engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 3 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 145, Alfa Romeo SpiderUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo 166 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Alfa Romeo 166 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.84 m
Width: 1.82 m1.79 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Alfa Romeo 166 is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Saber, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 490 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`9301`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1200no data
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 166 has
Honda Saber has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv