Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Kia Cerato 2007

 
Alfa Romeo 166
2003 - 2007
Kia Cerato
2007 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP143 HP
Torque: 181 NM186 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds9 seconds
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 7 HP more power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 5 NM less than Kia Cerato. Despite the higher power, Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.77.5
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 330 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km400'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Cerato engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 147, Alfa Romeo SpiderInstalled on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Alfa Romeo 166 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.48 m
Width: 1.80 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger, but lower.
Alfa Romeo 166 is 24 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 490 litres345 litres
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity.
Alfa Romeo 166 has 145 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9301`400
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 2800no data
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • roomier boot
Kia Cerato has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv