Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 304 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 9.9 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 13.0 | 8.3 - 12.6 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. On average, Alfa Romeo 166 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is smaller, but slightly higher. Alfa Romeo 166 is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 1`743 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |