Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Volvo S90 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo S90 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.9 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 180 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 304 NM | 260 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 9.9 seconds | 9 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 13.0 | 11.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1.9 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |