Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Kia Clarus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 116 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 304 NM | 152 - 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 9.9 seconds | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 13.0 | 9.3 - 12.0 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Clarus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 166 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Clarus, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 764 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 166 has 76 litres more trunk space than the Kia Clarus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |