Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Kia Cerato 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 105 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 - 385 NM | 143 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.9 seconds | 9 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 13.0 | 7.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo 166 is 24 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 345 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 166 has 145 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`931 | ~ 1`314 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |