Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo 166 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 3.9 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 145 - 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 - 385 NM | 210 - 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 13.0 | 9.6 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Malibu. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is 6 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 436 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Alfa Romeo 166 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. The Chevrolet Malibu may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`931 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |