Alfa Romeo 145 1997 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 145 engine produces 65 HP more power than Toyota Starlet, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Toyota Starlet. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 145 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.8 | |
|
The Toyota Starlet is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 145 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger. Alfa Romeo 145 is 35 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet, 7 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Alfa Romeo 145 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 220 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 145 has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |