Alfa Romeo 145 1995 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 145 engine produces 75 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 145 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 145 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 145 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger. Alfa Romeo 145 is 21 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 145 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Alfa Romeo 145 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 145 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |