Alfa Romeo 145 1994 vs Rover 200 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo 145 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Rover 200 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 155 HP | 75 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 187 NM | 117 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.5 seconds | 7.5 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.5 | 5.6 - 7.8 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 200. On average, Alfa Romeo 145 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger. Alfa Romeo 145 is 12 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | 1086 litres | |
| Alfa Romeo 145 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`709 | ~ 1`527 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 145 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |