Alfa Romeo 145 1999 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 155 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 255 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.7 | 7.3 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Baleno. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is larger. Alfa Romeo 145 is 16 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 145 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 145 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Alfa Romeo 145 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`710 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 145 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |