Volkswagen T4
| Year | Lowest ($) | Average ($) | Highest ($) | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 price | 3600 | 5000 | 6500 | |
| 2004 price | 800 | 1900 | 3900 | |
| 2003 price | 1700 | 2600 | 4200 | |
| 2002 price | 2700 | 3800 | 4700 | |
| 2001 price | 2200 | 2700 | 3400 | |
| 2000 price | 2100 | 2800 | 3800 | |
| 1999 price | 3100 | 3600 | 4100 | |
| 1998 price | 2000 | 2700 | 3400 | |
| 1997 price | 1800 | 2300 | 3300 | |
| 1996 price | 650 | 2400 | 5000 | |
| 1995 price | 2300 | 3800 | 5000 | |
| 1994 price | 1100 | 2100 | 3900 | |
| 1993 price | 800 | 1700 | 2200 | |
| 1992 price | 1100 | 2100 | 3300 | |
| 1991 price | 800 | 1600 | 2800 | |
| 1990 price | 550 | 1800 | 2800 | |
| 1988 price | 1900 | 2900 | 3900 | |
| 1984 price | 550 | 1600 | 3300 |
Volkswagen T4 reviews
Total 17 Volkswagen T4 owner reviews
Pros: Real work horse, not to let down. Good trafficability, simple repair, may caryy large weights up to tonne on a day-to-day basis, to be easy to go in rain and darkness, not hurt his legs when distant dungeons, more than 300km, etc
Cons: No comfort, as a horse, everything you need, but not more.
Inside noisy as an empty barrel:)
| Purchase year: | 2010 age of car 15 years) | Owned for | 200`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The ideal work horse, will never let you down.
Cons: What negative qualities not be for a work horse, if its function executes a perfect
| Purchase year: | 2008 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 320`000 kilometers (10 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Simple construction, inexpensive maintenance costs. Not have bandy electronics
Cons: It doesn't fit for aggressive driving
| Purchase year: | 2009 age of car 14 years) | Owned for | 320`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Lots of space, durable and comfortable bus.
Cons: After winter, rust foci appear.
| Purchase year: | 2016 age of car 13 years) | Owned for | 90`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 666 $ (~ 166 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2006 age of car 11 years) | Owned for | 340`000 kilometers (9 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.8 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A reliable car
Cons: The potential to reduce consumption of fuel.
| Purchase year: | 2015 age of car 16 years) | Owned for | 35`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Transparency is good, stable
Cons: It could be warmer in winter.
| Purchase year: | 1995 new car) | Owned for | 500`000 kilometers (21 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: horse
Cons: unfortunately, no longer produced