Volkswagen T4
Year | Lowest (€) | Average (€) | Highest (€) | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|
2005 price | 3200 | 4600 | 6000 | |
2004 price | 1100 | 2200 | 3500 | |
2003 price | 1700 | 2600 | 3200 | |
2002 price | 2200 | 3000 | 3500 | |
2001 price | 2400 | 2800 | 3500 | |
2000 price | 2300 | 3300 | 4500 | |
1999 price | 1700 | 2500 | 3500 | |
1998 price | 1400 | 2100 | 2700 | |
1997 price | 1300 | 2200 | 3500 | |
1996 price | 800 | 1700 | 2800 | |
1995 price | 1300 | 1800 | 2500 | |
1994 price | 1000 | 1800 | 2500 | |
1993 price | 600 | 1500 | 2800 | |
1992 price | 1100 | 1800 | 2900 | |
1991 price | 900 | 1400 | 2100 | |
1990 price | 500 | 1100 | 2000 | |
1988 price | 1700 | 2600 | 3500 |
Volkswagen T4 reviews
Total 18 Volkswagen T4 owner reviews
Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 23 years) | Owned for: | 25`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 9.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 500 € (~ 250 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Very good throughput, even in the absence of 4x4. Cheap parts. Durable suspension. Spacious, good maneuverability. Low road tax, though the N1 and truck are listed on the technical passport.
Cons: Loud. As with double cab trucks, there is no noise isolation. Had to embroider myself with extra sound / thermal insulation. Short gearbox with 1.9TD. At 85km/h, it sounds terrible. There is no long haul, more urban / suburban.
Purchase year: | 2010 (age of car 15 years) | Owned for: | 200`000 kilometers (6 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Real work horse, not to let down. Good trafficability, simple repair, may caryy large weights up to tonne on a day-to-day basis, to be easy to go in rain and darkness, not hurt his legs when distant dungeons, more than 300km, etc
Cons: No comfort, as a horse, everything you need, but not more.
Inside noisy as an empty barrel:)
Purchase year: | 2008 (age of car 13 years) | Owned for: | 320`000 kilometers (10 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (50% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The ideal work horse, will never let you down.
Cons: What negative qualities not be for a work horse, if its function executes a perfect
Purchase year: | 2009 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 320`000 kilometers (9 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.5 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Simple construction, inexpensive maintenance costs. Not have bandy electronics
Cons: It doesn't fit for aggressive driving
Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 13 years) | Owned for: | 90`000 kilometers (4 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Total cost of repairs: | 600 € (~ 150 € per year) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Lots of space, durable and comfortable bus.
Cons: After winter, rust foci appear.
Purchase year: | 2006 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 340`000 kilometers (9 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.8 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A reliable car
Cons: The potential to reduce consumption of fuel.
Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 35`000 kilometers (2 years) |
---|---|---|---|
Average fuel consumption: | 7.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) |
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Transparency is good, stable
Cons: It could be warmer in winter.