Peugeot 307
Peugeot 307 technical data
Select Peugeot 307 generation for full details - reviews, specifications, fuel consumption, pricing, quality and safety features, options, photos and more
Is Peugeot 307 a reliable car?
The Peugeot 307 is not a very reliable car. 80% of other cars of the same age are found to have fewer defects than the Peugeot 307 in annual roadworthiness tests.
According to these reviews, the highest reliability scores achieved Peugeot 307 generation from 2002 to 2005, but overall the reliability scores of all tested Peugeot 307 generations are quite similar.
Most Peugeot 307 engines use a timing belt, which is generally regarded as less reliable than engines with a timing chain.
Peugeot 307 reviews
Total 14 Peugeot 307 owner reviews
| Purchase year: | 2014 (age of car 11 years) | Owned for: | 55`000 kilometers (3 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 6.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 290 € (~ 96 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: A very good family car with option to put an extra two seats. Each chair is individually adjustable and removable, for example, middle row of chairs can be easily switched to back row. Inexpensive spare parts and low fuel consumption.
Cons: 2.0 diesel engine will not be suitable for drivers, who likes "put on floor" in other words, rather sluggish engine. Howling gearbox and repair costs around 300 eur.
| Purchase year: | 2010 (age of car 7 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 2120 € (~ 424 € per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Nice sedan, the interior and the handling is exactly. It goes very well, and it has good equipment
Cons: It requires a lot of maintenance, the clutch lasts 60 thousand km, there are gear box problems, a front bulb frequently burned out. It's a nice car but the parts don't last long.
| Purchase year: | 2002 (new car) | Owned for: | 140`000 kilometers (14 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Pleasant ergonomics in salon.
Cons: Quite hard suspension. Plastic parts which are borne by hand brake cables rattles. Trunk switch makes a mess.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 12 years) | Owned for: | 24`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.5 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 120 € (~ 120 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Plenty of room, good visibility, beautiful car.
Cons: Could be a little longer, then in third seats row could sit not only children.
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 12 years) | Owned for: | 1 year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Biggest plus - panoramic hatch! Comfortable boarding / disembarking, sitting.
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 4.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: convenient, cost-effective, simple, not fussy
| Purchase year: | 2013 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 5.0 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 500 € (~ 125 € per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Do not corrode, small, powerful, stylish