Mercedes SLK 2004 reviews
Mercedes SLK 2005 Diesel 2.0 litres, Automatic gearbox
| Purchase year: | 2005 (new car) | Owned for: | 100`000 kilometers (11 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 10.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
Total car rating:
10
Would recomend this car to the friend
The following reviews are not about this particular generation of Mercedes SLK, but about the Mercedes SLK produced in the surrounding years.
Mercedes SLK 2001 Petrol 3.2 litres, Automatic gearbox
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 14 years) | Owned for: | 30`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 11.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
Total car rating:
10
Would recomend this car to the friend
Review - positive and negative sides
Pros: The car meant for people who like speed and cramped roads
female, age 37
Mercedes SLK 1997 Petrol 2.0 litres, Manual gearbox
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 19 years) | Owned for: | 10`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.0 litres per 100km (60% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 55 € | ||
Total car rating:
8
Would recomend this car to the friend
Review - positive and negative sides
Pros: For Latvian climate the best convertible - automatic hard roof.
Not complicated, as far as I understand it all technical side is a class C
OK is also above 130km / h, good feelings also on rural roads normal service conditions without a roof luggage rack is as spacious as any small sedan
Cons: Nothing's perfect
Almost 20 years it is not a new car.
Bit hard for Latvian roads
For such a small car could be lighter
male, age 45
We have more reviews on other Mercedes SLK generations (3 reviews)!