Land Rover Range Rover 1988 reviews
Find below reviews about other generations of Land Rover Range Rover.
| Purchase year: | 2012 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 60`000 kilometers (4 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.5 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 1165.5 $ (~ 291 $ per year) | ||
Would NOT recomend this car to the friend
Pros: If everything is working - great car. Spends on highway, 7 litres for a hundred. Pneimo suspension is excellent. Parts does not cost even half of Land Cruiser prices. I've also been off-road - sometimes it seems like no car can get through, but Range Rover handles everything perfectly
Cons: The engine could be more powerfull. In France about this car, says - If you see one, then he's going to service, either from that. And it's true, all time is less than or greater problems. The original electronics is unreliable, absolutely do not recomment automatic gearbox- it switches all the time, even in constant speed.
| Purchase year: | 2017 (age of car 17 years) | Owned for: | 10`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.5 litres per 100km (70% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 222 $ | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Thanks to pneumo suspension of a very good feeling when driving! Do not listen to those who regret spend 60 euros for air cushion or compressor and valve repair kit 30 euros. Large and comfortable interior, pleasant shared door at back. Thanks to pneumo suspension of car you can choose different heights, regardless of how many passengers or goods are contained in car! From 99 comes with a TC system for all 4 wheels, which makes car equivalent to those who have all three diff blocks! The system works only if ABS system is working!
Cons: Diesel is little too weak, but at least it was simple and digests any diesel without problems. Placement of gearbox radiator is constructively bad, but it can be easily solved by replacing radiator (120 euros) to newer which it is integrated in same housing with engine cooling radiator.
| Purchase year: | 2016 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 20`000 kilometers (0 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 15.0 litres per 100km (90% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: Super car!
| Purchase year: | 2010 (age of car 10 years) | Owned for: | 80`000 kilometers (6 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.0 litres per 100km (30% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 932.4 $ (~ 155 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 16 years) | Owned for: | 33`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 20.0 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 639.36 $ (~ 639 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 9 years) | Owned for: | 66`000 kilometers (2 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 16.0 litres per 100km (40% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
| Purchase year: | 2015 (age of car 8 years) | Owned for: | 40`000 kilometers (5 years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 12.4 litres per 100km (20% urban driving) | ||
| Total cost of repairs: | 9149.73 $ (~ 1829 $ per year) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: very good 4x4, luxurious and comfortable. feels very solid and well built
Cons: costly to properly maintain
| Purchase year: | 2018 (age of car 6 years) | Owned for: | 18`000 kilometers (1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average fuel consumption: | 8.7 litres per 100km (80% urban driving) | ||
Would recomend this car to the friend
Pros: The car is perfect, unrivalled in its class! This car is not for the poor, they buy old cars with fake mileage, improperly serviced at who knows what service, and then wonder and tell stories to each other, this is not the car to buy for the last money, all cars need proper service!!