Volkswagen Polo 1994 vs Ford Fiesta 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 - 100 HP | 60 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 - 135 NM | 103 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | 9.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 8.6 | 4.2 - 6.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 979 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`401 | ~ 1`506 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |