Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 45 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 76 - 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.5 | 4.7 - 8.6 | |
Volkswagen Polo 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo 1994. On average, Volkswagen Polo 1999 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 1994. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.74 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 1999 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo 1994, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 975 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo 1999 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo 1994, which means Volkswagen Polo 1999 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`416 | ~ 1`401 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |