Volkswagen Polo 2005 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 150 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 310 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17.5 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.8 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger. Volkswagen Polo is 39 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 860 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 140 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |