Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 94 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 163 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Subaru Forester has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Subaru Forester quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 18 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |