Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan 200 SX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 286 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 407 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 12.4 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 5 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 11 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 1.8 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`780 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 25 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |