Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 3 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 180 HP105 - 260 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM145 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 11.7 seconds6.1 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.04.3 - 9.6
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)119 - 155 mm (4.7 - 6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.48 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 28 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1360 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 342 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`021~ 1`864
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 42005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv