Honda Accord 2005 vs Citroen C5 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Honda Accord is more dynamic to drive. Honda Accord engine produces 12 HP more power than Citroen C5, but torque is 10 NM less than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
The Honda Accord is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Accord consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
740 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 20 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Citroen C5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Honda Accord 2005 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Accord 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
Honda Accord is smaller. Honda Accord is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen C5, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1657 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Honda Accord can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | low | |
Honda Accord has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda Accord, so Honda Accord quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |