Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 69 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 126 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 13.3 - 20.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.0 - 8.3 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Caddy. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger, but lower. Ford Galaxy is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2239 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 2`024 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |