Volvo V60 2010 vs Seat Exeo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V60 engine produces 43 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Seat Exeo. Thanks to more power Volvo V60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.0 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V60 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V60 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo V60 is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Exeo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V60 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 442 litres | |
| Volvo V60 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |