Volvo V60 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 367 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 500 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 12.7 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 10.2 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Volvo V60 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Volvo V60 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volvo V60 is smaller. Volvo V60 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V60 is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Volvo V60 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V60 is 1.9 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Volvo V60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`168 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |