Volkswagen Tiguan 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Tiguan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Tiguan is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1655 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Tiguan has 112 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |