Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Smart ForFour 2004

 
Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP95 HP
Torque: 124 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds10.8 seconds
Smart ForFour is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Fox engine produces 20 HP less power than Smart ForFour, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Smart ForFour. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.75.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Smart ForFour is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Fox could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway970 km on highway
720 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.83 m3.75 m
Width: 1.66 m1.68 m
Height: 1.54 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Fox is 8 cm longer than the Smart ForFour, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres268 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1016 litres910 litres
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Fox has 8 litres less trunk space than the Smart ForFour. This could mean that the Volkswagen Fox uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 106 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 0.5 metres more than that of the Smart ForFour, which means Volkswagen Fox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5201`450
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Smart ForFour has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Smart ForFour, so Smart ForFour quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20001800
Pros and Cons:
    Smart ForFour has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv