Toyota Auris 2015 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Auris engine produces 174 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 240 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Toyota Auris reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.7 | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Auris consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Toyota Auris over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Verso | Used also on Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Auris 2015 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Auris 2015 1.6 engine Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time. In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Toyota Auris is smaller. Toyota Auris is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Auris is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Auris is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Toyota Auris can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`835 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Auris has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |