Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Citroen C4 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 121 HP | 90 - 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 - 152 NM | 133 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.5 seconds | 10.1 - 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 9.2 | 4.5 - 8.1 | |
|
Suzuki Baleno petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, Suzuki Baleno equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller. Suzuki Baleno is 5 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1023 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`755 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |