Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 50 NM less than Skoda Yeti. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |